Re: D700 : Différence entre le profil icc "NIKON ADOBE RGB 4.0.0.3000" et "ADOBE RGB (1998)" ?
par
matthiasbxl
» Jeudi 12 Novembre 2009 12:43
Pascom : Malheureusement le profil réel ABODE RGB de l'appareil est "NIKON ADOBE RGB 4.0.0.3000" et pas "ADOBE RGB (1998)".
Une petite info trouvée sur le Net :
I haven't checked Nikon's sRGB, but a similar problem came up with Nikon AdobeRGB. My post to another list is reproduced below.
For those who want the "real" Adobe1998 profile embedded in their files (and not the Nikon "equivalent"), it's relatively easy to do without
resorting to PS to assign (or "null convert") profiles. This has no functional significance, other than to decrease confusion among those receiving the files who might otherwise think that the profiles are significantly different.
The Nikon Adobe1998 (aka NKAdobe.icm) and bone fide Adobe1998.icm files are very similar, but they are not exactly the same. Nikon, for some
inexplicable reason, left out the "Media black-point tristimulus" setting, which should be 0,0,0. Everything else is essentially identical to the
bone fide Adobe file. Therefore, instead of modifying the Nikon file to have the correct non-Nikon, pure Adobe name inside (but with incomplete media settings), use a copy of the real Adobe1998 file to replace Nikon's file (NKAdobe.icm). Rename the copy of the Adobe file to NKAdobe.icm and replace Nikon's version. It should work fine, as Nikon's software is just looking for a profile with the correct name. The embedded profile will then be AdobeRGB 1998, rather than Nikon AdobeRGB 1998..
Make sure to watch out for other, similar-sounding files (e.g., %_NKAdobe.icm, etc.) that should NOT be replaced or modified.